METHODOLOGY FOR DEVELOPING STUDENTS' SCIENTIFIC THINKING BASED ON PISA AND PIRLS CRITERIA
Keywords:
PISA, PIRLS, scientific thinking, functional literacy, reading literacy, natural and scientific worldview, pedagogical methodology.Abstract
This scientific article comprehensively studies the methodology for developing scientific and logical thinking of secondary school students based on the criteria of the international assessment programs PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) and PIRLS (Progress in International Reading Literacy Study), which are considered one of the most important priorities of the modern education system. The main goal of the study is to abandon the tradition of simply memorizing factual knowledge in the educational process and develop optimal pedagogical mechanisms for developing functional literacy, understanding and analyzing text, and solving life problems using scientific methods in students. The work highlights the integrative relationship between the PISA program's natural and scientific literacy and the PIRLS program's reading literacy areas using pedagogical experiments and empirical analyses.
References
1.Schleicher, A. (2018). World Class: How to build a 21st-century school system. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264300002-en
2.Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (2019). PIRLS 2021 Assessment Frameworks. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
3.Kirsch, I., de Jong, J., Lafontaine, D., McQueen, J., Mendelovits, J., & Christian, K. (2002). Reading for Change: Performance and engagement across countries: Results from PISA 2000. OECD Publishing.
4.Raxmonov, A. A. (2023). Umumiy o‘rta ta’lim muassasalarida xalqaro baholash dasturlarini joriy etishning pedagogik asoslari. Fan va texnologiya.
5.Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
6.Piza, M., Santos, R., & Silva, J. (2021). Interdisciplinary approaches in science education: Aligning national curricula with PISA standards. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(4), 512–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09901-w
7.Bybee, R. W. (2015). The PISA 2015 science framework and scientific literacy. National Science Teachers Association.
8.Martin, M. O., Von Davier, M., & Mullis, I. V. S. (Eds.). (2020). Methods in international reading literacy studies: PIRLS technical report. IEA.
9.PISA (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f2383c-en
10.Xusanov, B. M. (2022). Tabiiy fanlarni o‘qitishda integrativ yondashuv va xalqaro PISA topshiriqlari bilan ishlash metodikasi. Zamonaviy ta’lim, 8(3), 18-25.
11.Dilova, N. (2025). BUXORO – ILM-FAN VA MADANIYATNING JAHONSHUMUL MARKAZI. NEW APPROACHES IN EDUCATION: PEDAGOGY, INNOVATION, AND DEVELOPMENT, 1(1), 83–89. Retrieved from https://worldconferences.us/index.php/nae/article/view/118
12.Dilova, N. G. (2022). Zamonaviy ta’limda shaxslararo munosabatning ahamiyati. Science and Education, 3(7), 151-156.
13.DILOVA, N. hAMKORLIK MUhITINI RIVOJLANTIRIShDA PЕDAGOG MAHORATINING O ‘RNI. XALQ TA’LIMI, 64.
14.Dilova, N. G. (2018). Boshlang ‘ich ta’limda o ‘zaro hamkorlik muhitini shakllantirish mexanizmlarini takomillashtirish: pedagogika fanlari bo ‘yicha falsafa doktori (PhD).... diss.
