COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL VIEWS OF ABU NASR AL-FARABI AND AL-GHAZALI (BASED ON AL-FARABI’S “POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY” AND AL-GHAZALI’S “THE ALCHEMY OF HAPPINESS”)

Authors

  • Alimjonova Nurizar,Sherxanov Sultonmurod Davronboy oʻgʻli Turan international university student Author

Keywords:

Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali, political philosophy, The Chemistry of Happiness, philosophy, morality, state, happiness, mysticism

Abstract

This article provides a comparative analysis of the philosophical views of the great figures of Eastern philosophy, Abu Nasr al-Farabi and Abu Hamid al-Ghazali. In particular, Al-Farabi's political-philosophical concepts and Al-Ghazali's moral-spiritual views are studied in the context of their main works. The study reveals similarities and differences in the interpretation of the concepts of state, society, human perfection and happiness. The results show that while Al-Farabi's rational-philosophical approach is dominant, Al-Ghazali's religious-moral and mystical approach is dominant.

References

1.Abu Nasr al-Farabi. (1985). Al-Madina al-fadila (The virtuous city) (R. Walzer, Trans.). Oxford University Press.

2.Abu Nasr al-Farabi. (2001). Political writings: “Selected aphorisms” and other texts (C. E. Butterworth, Trans.). Cornell University Press.

3.Abu Hamid al-Ghazali. (2005). The alchemy of happiness (Kimyā-yi sa‘ādat) (C. Field, Trans.). Kazi Publications.

4.Abu Hamid al-Ghazali. (2000). The incoherence of the philosophers (Tahāfut al-falāsifa) (M. E. Marmura, Trans.). Brigham Young University Press.

5.Majid Fakhry. (2002). Al-Farabi: Founder of Islamic Neoplatonism. Oneworld Publications.

6.Frank Griffel. (2009). Al-Ghazali’s philosophical theology. Oxford University Press.

7.Seyyed Hossein Nasr. (2006). Islamic philosophy from its origin to the present. SUNY Press.

8.Oliver Leaman. (2000). A brief introduction to Islamic philosophy. Polity Press.

9.Peter Adamson. (2016). Philosophy in the Islamic world. Oxford University Press.

10.Dimitri Gutas. (2012). Avicenna and the Aristotelian tradition. Brill.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30 — Updated on 2026-05-04

Versions