SEMANTIC-PRAGMATIC FEATURES OF EMOTIONAL INTERJECTIONS IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH

Authors

  • To‘xtayeva Laylo Sho‘xratjon qizi x Author

Keywords:

Emotional interjections, semantics, pragmatics, Uzbek language, English language, comparative linguistics.

Abstract

 This study examines the semantic and pragmatic features of emotional interjections in Uzbek and English from a comparative perspective. Emotional interjections are important linguistic units that express speakers’ feelings, attitudes, and reactions in communication. From the perspective of Semantics, te. The research analyzes examples from both languages and identifies similarities and differences in their use. The findings show that emotihey function as carriers of emotional meaning, while Pragmatics focuses on their communicative role and context-dependent usagonal interjections have universal characteristics but vary in form, intensity, and cultural usage. The study highlights their importance in effective communication, translation, and language teaching.

References

1.Toshaliev, M. (2023). Pragmatic categories in Uzbek and their role in speech. Philological Journal, 2(3), 90–97.

2.Karimov, B. (2022). Semantic features of interjections in Uzbek language. Uzbek Linguistics Journal, 8(2), 45–58.

3.Yuldasheva, D. (2021). Emotional expressions and their linguistic functions in Uzbek. Journal of Central Asian Philology, 5(1), 22–34.

4.Rakhimov, A. (2023). Comparative analysis of interjections in English and Uzbek languages. International Journal of Linguistic Studies, 10(2), 77–89.

5.Ismailova, N. (2020). Pragmatic aspects of speech units in modern linguistics. Language and Communication Journal, 6(1), 13–25.

6.Smith, J. (2021). Interjections and emotional expression in English discourse. Journal of English Linguistics, 49(3), 201–215.

7.Brown, L. (2022). Pragmatic functions of emotional language in communication. Discourse Studies Review, 14(2), 66–80.

8.Aliyev, F. (2020). Semantic-pragmatic analysis of expressive units. Central Asian Language Review, 3(1), 30–42.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30